Geometric Mean Ratios Of Cmax Research Articles

Cariprazine Orodispersible Tablet: A New Formulation for Cariprazine.

Cariprazine is an atypical dopamine receptor partial agonist antipsychotic available in the form of capsules. Although capsules are one of the most desirable routes of administration, there are certain situations (e. g., in an acute psychiatric setting, or when swallowing difficulties, or liquid shortages are present) when they cannot be administered. Therefore, alternative solutions like orodispersible tablets are needed. This study aimed to investigate the bioequivalence of a newly developed orodispersible tablet to the commercially available hard gelatine capsule of cariprazine 1.5 mg. This was a phase I, open-label, randomized, single-dose bioequivalence study. It had a 2-period, 2-sequence, cross-over design, where each subject received one test and one reference product in a randomized sequence, separated by a wash-out period of 55 days. Blood sampling was performed over 72 h after dosing. Cariprazine concentrations were analyzed by a validated HPLC-MS/MS method. Standard bioequivalence statistics was applied to PK parameters calculated by non-compartmental analysis. Safety measures were analyzed descriptively. Pharmacokinetic data of 43 healthy volunteers and safety data of 54 subjects was analyzed. Cariprazine AUC0-72h and Cmax geometric mean ratios were 117.76% and 100.88%, respectively. The 90% confidence intervals were within the pre-defined bioequivalence acceptance limits of 80.00% - 125.00%. Safety data was in line with the Summary of Product Characteristics of Cariprazine. The result of this clinical trial proved the bioequivalence of the new orodispersible tablet formulation when compared to hard gelatine capsules, enabling an alternative option for treatment of those suffering from schizophrenia.

Randomized Trial of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Effects of 13.2 mg Intranasal Epinephrine Treatment in Congestion

Background: Nasal congestion could affect the absorption of an epinephrine nasal spray (ENS).Objective: To compare the pharmacokinetics of 13.2 mg ENS with nasal congestion to without congestion and to intramuscular (IM) treatments.Methods: This Phase I, open-label, 4-period randomized crossover study enrolled 51 healthy adults with seasonal allergies into cohorts that received a single dose of 13.2 mg ENS (NDS1C) administered as 2 consecutive sprays in either opposite nostrils (Cohort 1) or the same nostril (Cohort 2). Both cohorts received 13.2 mg ENS with and without nasal allergen challenge (NAC), 0.3 mg IM epinephrine by autoinjector, and 0.5 mg IM epinephrine by manual syringe (MS).Results: ENS after NAC resulted in higher extent and peak exposures and more rapid time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) versus ENS without NAC and IM treatments. In Cohort 1, maximum observed baseline-adjusted epinephrine plasma concentration (Cmax, pg/mL) with ENS with NAC, IM autoinjector, IM MS, or ENS without NAC was 458.0, 279.0, 364.2, and 270.1, respectively, and in Cohort 2 was 436.3, 228.2, 322.3, and 250.8, respectively. The Cmax geometric mean ratio (90% CI) for ENS with NAC versus without NAC in Cohort 1 was 170% (123%, 234%) and in Cohort 2 was 174% (115%, 263%). In Cohort 1, Tmax was 15, 21, 45, and 25 minutes, respectively, and in Cohort 2 was 18, 20, 45, and 20 minutes, respectively (p<0.01 for ENS with NAC vs IM MS). Postdose mean heart rate and blood pressure remained stable and relatively similar to predose values regardless of plasma epinephrine concentration. Mild nausea and headache were the most common adverse events with ENS.Conclusion: 13.2 mg ENS with congestion demonstrated enhanced absorption versus IM treatments and ENS without congestion and appeared well tolerated. There was no clinically impactful relationship between pharmacodynamic effects and plasma epinephrine concentration.

Pharmacokinetics of apixaban in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PAP-UP).

The impact of pancreaticoduodenectomy on absorption of drugs in the duodenum remains largely unknown. We aim to characterize the pharmacokinetics of apixaban in patients who had previously undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy. A single 10-mg dose of apixaban was administered to 4 volunteers who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at least 6 months prior. The maximum plasma apixaban concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration time-curve (AUC0-24, AUC0-inf) were compared against healthy historical control subjects (N = 12). Geometric mean ratios (GMR) with 90% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for determination of comparative bioequivalence. In pancreaticoduodenectomy patients, AUC0-24 and AUC0-inf were 1,861 and 2,080 ng×h/mL, respectively. The GMRs of AUC0-24 and AUC0-inf between study subjects and healthy controls were 1.27 (90% CI 0.88 - 1.83) and 1.18 (90% CI 0.82 - 1.72). The mean Cmax of apixaban was 201 ng/mL (SD 15.6) occurring at a median tmax of 3.25 hours (range 2.5 - 4 hours). The GMR of Cmax between study subjects and healthy controls was 1.12 (90% CI 0.77 - 1.63). The pharmacokinetic characteristics of apixaban in subjects who had undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy are not significantly different from those of healthy controls. Though the sample size of this study is small, results suggest that no change to apixaban dose regimen is needed in patients who have had a pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Bioequivalence Study of Tebipenem Pivoxil in Healthy Chinese Adults.

Tebipenem pivoxil (TP) is a carbapenem and is applied against pneumonia, otitis media, and sinusitis. This study compared the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of a test (T) preparation and reference (R) preparation of TP in healthy Chinese adults. This study was a single-center, randomized, open, single-dose (fasting/postprandial) oral administration, two-agent, two-sequence, two-cycle, crossover bioequivalence trial. A total of 60 participants were enrolled (24 fasting and 36 postprandial). All participants were randomly assigned to the TR sequence and RT sequence. Subsequently, they switched T sequences or R sequences 7 days later. PK blood samples were collected according to the protocol, plasma TP concentration was determined by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, main PK parameters were calculated based on a non-compartment model, and adverse events were recorded during the test. In the feeding arm, the geometric mean ratio of maximum concentration (Cmax) was 89.84% (90% confidence interval 84.33-95.70), the geometric mean ratio of area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to last time of quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t) was 86.80% (83.62-90.10), and the geometric mean ratio of area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity time of quantifiable concentration (AUC0-∞) was 86.90% (83.73-90.20), which were within the acceptable range of bioequivalence (80-125%). In the fasting arm, the geometric mean ratio of Cmax was 96.07% (89.62-102.99), the geometric mean ratio of AUC0-t was 93.09% (90.47-95.78), and the geometric mean ratio of AUC0-∞ was 93.09% (90.48-95.77), which was within the acceptable range of bioequivalence (80-125%). Hence, the T preparation and R preparation of TP had bioequivalence in the fasting arm and feeding arm of the clinical trial. In addition, all adverse events were mild, and no severe adverse events were noted. Preparations T and R of TP were bioequivalent in the fasting and postprandial groups in clinical trials, and TP was safe.

Demonstrating Bioequivalence for Two Dose Strengths of Niraparib andAbiraterone AcetateDual-Action Tablets Versus Single Agents: Utility of Clinical Study Data Supplemented with Modeling and Simulation.

The combination of niraparib and abiraterone acetate (AA) plus prednisone is under investigation for the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). Regular-strength (RS) and lower-strength (LS) dual-action tablets (DATs), comprising niraparib 100 mg/AA 500 mg and niraparib 50 mg/AA 500 mg, respectively, were developed to reduce pill burden and improve patient experience. A bioequivalence (BE)/bioavailability (BA) study was conducted under modified fasting conditions in patients with mCRPC to support approval of the DATs. This open-label randomized BA/BE study (NCT04577833) was conducted at 14 sites in the USA and Europe. The study had a sequential design, including a 21-day screening phase, a pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment phase comprising three periods [namely (1) single-dose with up to 1-week run-in, (2) daily doseon days 1-11, and (3) daily dose ondays 12-22], an extension where both niraparib and AA as single-agent combination (SAC; reference) or AA alone was continued from day 23 until discontinuation, and a 30-day follow-up phase. Patients were randomly assigned in a parallel-group design (four-sequence randomization) to receive a single oral dose of niraparib 100 mg/AA 1000 mg as a LS-DAT or SAC in period 1, and patients continued as randomized into a two-way crossover design during periods 2 and 3 where they received niraparib 200 mg/AA 1000 mg once daily as a RS-DAT or SAC. The design was powered on the basis of crossover assessment of RS-DAT versus SAC. During repeated dosing (periods 2 and 3, and extension phase), all patients also received prednisone/prednisolone 5 mg twice daily. Plasma samples were collected for measurement of niraparib and abiraterone plasma concentrations. Statistical assessment of the RS-DAT and LS-DAT versus SAC was performed on log-transformed pharmacokinetic parameters data from periods 2 and 3 (crossover) and from period 1 (parallel), respectively. Additional paired analyses and model-based bioequivalence assessments were conducted to evaluate the similarity between the LS-DAT and SAC. For the RS-DAT versus SAC, the 90% confidence intervals (CI) of geometric mean ratios (GMR) for maximum concentration at a steady state (Cmax,ss) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0-24 h at a steady state (AUC 0-24h,ss) were respectively 99.18-106.12% and 97.91-104.31% for niraparib and 87.59-106.69 and 86.91-100.23% for abiraterone. For the LS-DAT vs SAC, the 90% CI of GMR for AUC0-72h of niraparib was 80.31-101.12% in primary analysis, the 90% CI of GMR for Cmax,ss and AUC 0-24h,ss of abiraterone was 85.41-118.34% and 86.51-121.64% respectively, and 96.4% of simulated LS-DAT versus SAC BE trials met the BE criteria for both niraparib and abiraterone. The RS-DAT met BE criteria (range 80%-125%) versus SAC based on 90% CI of GMR for Cmax,ss and AUC 0-24h,ss. The LS-DAT was considered BE to SAC on the basis of the niraparib component meeting the BE criteria in the primary analysis for AUC 0-72h; abiraterone meeting the BE criteria in additional paired analyses based on Cmax,ss and AUC 0-24h,ss; and the percentage of simulated LS-DAT versus SAC BE trials meeting the BE criteria for both. NCT04577833.

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of tofacitinib 5 mg in healthy Korean male subjects.

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor marketed as an immunomodulator that can effectively treat rheumatoid arthritis. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics and evaluate the bioequivalence of tofacitinib free base (CKD-374) with those of tofacitinib citrate (Xeljanz). A randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-sequence, 2-period crossover study was conducted in healthy Korean male subjects. A total of 36 subjects were randomized into two sequence groups. At each period, subjects were administered the test formulation (tofacitinib free base, 5 mg) or the reference formulation (tofacitinib citrate, 8.078 mg; as tofacitinib, 5 mg). The plasma samples were collected up to 12 hours post dose and analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters, including maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve from dosing to the last measurable concentration (AUC0-t), were determined by non-compartmental analysis. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios for Cmax and AUC0-t were calculated to evaluate pharmacokinetic equivalence. The 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUC0-t for tofacitinib free base to tofacitinib citrate were 0.9144-1.1230 and 1.0245-1.0932, respectively. All reported adverse events were of mild intensity, and there were no serious adverse events. In healthy Korean male adult subjects, the pharmacokinetic parameters of tofacitinib free base and tofacitinib citrate were evaluated and met the pharmacokinetic bioequivalent criteria. Both formulations were safe and well-tolerated.

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence evaluation of two oral formulations of cotrimoxazole tablets in healthy Chinese volunteers under fasting conditions

This bioequivalence study was conducted to evaluate two oral formulations of cotrimoxazole tablets in healthy Chinese subjects. All 26 subjects recruited to this study were randomly and evenly classified into two groups and received a single dose (sulfamethoxazole: 400 mg and trimethoprim: 80 mg) of test cotrimoxazole tablets (generic drug) or reference cotrimoxazole tablets (branded drug). After a 7-day washout period, these subjects received one dose of reference drug or test drug. Blood samples were collected from participants before and up to 48 h after dosing to assess the concentration of sulfamethoxazole (SMX) and trimethoprim (TMP) in plasma and a plasma concentration-time curve was drawn. Then, the pharmacokinetics parameters were calculated accordingly. Our data revealed that there were no significant differences observed in the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration (AUC0-t), and area under the curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞) between the two formulations. For SMX, the 90% confidence intervals (CI) of the geometric mean ratio for Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were 104.03-113.92%, 100.46-103.70%, and 100.41-103.81%, respectively. Similarly, for Trimethoprim (TMP), the 90% CI ranged from 98.54 to 106.95% for Cmax, from 99.31 to 107.68% for AUC0-t, and from 99.49 to 107.55% for AUC0-∞. Importantly, all these 90% CI values fell within the range of 80.00–125.00%, indicating that the test drug is bioequivalent to the reference drug. Furthermore, throughout the entire trial, no suspected serious adverse events were reported, indicating the safety profile of the newly developed generic cotrimoxazole. In summary, our study demonstrates that the newly developed generic formulation of cotrimoxazole is bioequivalent to the branded formulation under fasting conditions.

Feasibility of Using Population Pharmacokinetics-Based Virtual Control Groups in Organ Impairment Studies.

This work aimed to assess the feasibility of using population pharmacokinetics (popPK) to generate virtual healthy control groups in organ impairment studies. Data from 11 organ impairment studies containing 18 organ impairment arms and 13 healthy control groups across 7 drugs were analyzed. Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax ) were calculated from popPK-simulated individual concentration-time profiles for participants in the healthy control groups, accounting for the participant's specific covariate(s) (N = 1000 replicates). The AUC and Cmax geometric mean ratios (GMRs; simulated healthy control/observed healthy control and observed organ impairment/simulated healthy control) were calculated. The simulated healthy control group geometric mean exposures were within 30% of the observed geometric mean exposures in 8 of the 11 studies (73%). The number of organ impairment arms for which the observed GMR (observed organ impairment/observed healthy control) and median of simulation-based GMRs (observed organ impairment/simulated healthy control) for AUC and Cmax being within the same fold change were 12 (67%) and 13 (72%) arms, respectively. The number of organ impairment arms for which the median of simulation-based AUC and Cmax GMRs were within the 90% confidence interval of the observed GMRs were 14 (72%) and 15 (83%), respectively. Poor concordance was observed for 1 drug (3 arms), where healthy participants' data were not incorporated in the popPK model. This work supports using popPK-based virtual control groups in organ impairment studies. Subsequent work should aim to establish best practices for constructing popPK-based virtual control groups.

Evaluating the bioequivalence and safety of liraglutide injection versus Victoza® in healthy Chinese subjects: a randomized, open, two-cycle, self-crossover phase I clinical trial.

Background: Liraglutide is an acylated glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analog, and its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties as a GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonist make it an important therapeutic option for many patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. This study compared the bioequivalence and safety of liraglutide with the originator product in healthy Chinese adult subjects. Methods: Subjects (N = 36, both sexes) were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two groups (18 cases each) for a two-cycle, self-crossover trial. Each cycle involved a single subcutaneous injection of the test and reference drugs, with a washout period of 14days. The plasma drug concentration was quantified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The main pharmacokinetic parameters were statistically analyzed to assess drug bioequivalence. Furthermore, the safety of the drugs was assessed throughout the trial. Results: The geometric mean ratios of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were 103.73%, 103.01%, and 103.03%, respectively, and their 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were consistent with the range of 80.00%-125.00%, indicating that the two formulations had similar pharmacokinetics. Meanwhile, safety results showed that both drugs were well tolerated. Conclusion: Studies have shown that the test drug has similar bioequivalence and safety to the reference drug. Clinical trial registration: (http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html), identifier (CTR20171303).

Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of a new long-acting insulin analog in healthy Chinese volunteers: an open, randomized, single-dose, two-period and two-sequence cross-over study.

Objectives: INS068 is a novel, soluble, and long-acting insulin analog. In this study, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of two formulations of INS068 in healthy Chinese subjects: a reference formulation packaged in vials and administered via syringe (R), and a test formulation packaged and administered via pen injector (T). Methods: A randomized, open-label, two-period, two-sequence crossover study was conducted with 24 healthy Chinese subjects. Subjects were randomized and administered subcutaneously in the abdomen at 0.4 U/kg of test or reference INS068 injection according to an open crossover design. INS068 concentrations in the serum were measured using LC-MS/MS, and the pharmacokinetic parameters of maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-t and AUC0-∞) were used to evaluate relative bioavailability. Results: After a single dose at 0.4 U/kg, the median Tmax of INS068 was 12 h for both formulations, and the mean t1/2 for T and R was 13.0 h and 12.6 h, respectively. The geometric means of Cmax and AUC0-∞ were 3.99 nmol/L and 120 h·nmol/L for the T, and 4.05 nmol/L and 117 h·nmol/L for the R, respectively. The geometric mean ratios of Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ of T over R were 98.7% (90% CI: 92.7%-105.2%), 102.6% (90% CI: 100.0%-105.3%) and 102.8% (90% CI: 100.1%-105.5%). Conclusion: The overall PK profile of the two formulations of INS068 injection was comparable in healthy subjects, and the pen injector of INS068 had adequate safety and tolerability, supporting it as a new formulation in a phase III study and bridging PK data from early phase clinical trials. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT05336071.

Evaluation of bioequivalence and safety analysis of capecitabine tablets and Xeloda® under postprandial dosing conditions in Chinese patients with solid tumor

ABSTRACT Objectives To compare the pharmacokinetic and safety of the test group capecitabine tablets (0.5 g) and the reference group capecitabine tablets (0.5 g). Methods This study was registered at www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn under the registration number CTR20220138. 48 subjects with solid tumor were recruited and randomized to receive either the test group or the reference group at a dose of 2 g per cycle for three cycles of the entire trial. Results The point estimate of the geometric mean ratio of Cmax for the subject and reference groups was 1.0670, which was in the range of 80.00%-125.00%. And the upper limit of 95% confidence interval was −0.0450 < 0. The statistics of geometric mean ratio of AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ (test group/reference group) and their 90% confidence intervals were in the range of 80.00%-125.00%, thus the test group was bioequivalent to the reference group under the conditions of this postprandial test. There were no major or serious adverse events. Conclusion: The pharmacokinetic profiles of capecitabine under postprandial conditions were consistent between the two groups. The two groups were bioequivalent and had a similar favorable safety profile in Chinese patients with solid tumor.

Bioequivalence of 240mg Apalutamide Tablets and Preparation in Aqueous Food Vehicles for Alternative Administration.

A 240-mg single tablet has been developed with the focus of reducing the pill burden of the apalutamide daily dose of 240mg (4×60-mg tablets). An open-label, randomized, single-dose phase 1 study with a 2-sequence and 2-period crossover design in healthy men determined the bioequivalence of a 240-mg single tablet versus the currently available 4×60-mg tablets (Part 1, N = 74) and assessed effect of a high-fat meal (Part 2, N = 21) on apalutamide maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-72h). The 90% confidence interval of geometric mean ratios for Cmax and AUC0-72h fell between 80% and 125% for both Part 1 and Part 2. No new safety concerns with the 240-mg single tablet were observed. To support the use of different food vehicles as well as nasogastric (NG) tubes for alternative administration, we conducted in vitro compatibility studies to evaluate the purity, dose, and stability of 240-mg tablets dispersed in applesauce/yogurt/orange juice/green tea as well as in NG tubes (polyurethane/silicone/polyvinyl chloride). The studies confirmed the alternative administrations do not affect the purity, dose-accuracy, or stability of apalutamide. The apalutamide 240-mg tablet is bioequivalent to 4×60-mg tablets and compatible with the tested food vehicles and NG tubes.

Unveiling the Influence of a High-Fat Meal on the Pharmacokinetics of Oral Globalagliatin, A Glucokinase Activator, in Healthy Chinese Volunteers.

Glucokinase (GK) plays a pivotal role in maintaining glucose homeostasis; globalagliatin, a newly developed drug, is a GK activator (GKA). This study constitutes a randomized, open-label, two-cycle, two-crossover, single-dose, phase I clinical trial conducted at a single center with healthy Chinese volunteers, aiming to examine the influence of a high-fat meal on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of orally administered globalagliatin. Twenty-four healthy volunteers were randomly divided into two groups, with a washout period of 16 days between the two cycles. The first cycle involved Group 1 volunteers who were orally administered globalagliatin 80 mg with 240 mL of water while fasting on Day 1. In contrast, Group 2 volunteers began oral administration of globalagliatin 80 mg with 240 mL of water, 30 min after consuming a high-fat meal (where high-fat content contributed to 54% of the total calories; the high-calorie meal amounted to 988.4 kcal). After the washout period, both groups of volunteers entered the second cycle of drug administration, with meals and medication being swapped on Day 17. Each volunteer collected blood samples at the following time points: 0h (within 1h before administration), and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and 168h after administration on both trial Day 1 and Day 17. The primary and secondary PK parameters were collected. The validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was used to determine the concentration of globalagliatin in collected plasma samples, and the results were analyzed using Phoenix WinNonlin software. Safety evaluation was conducted by detecting or observing various adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs). All 24 healthy Chinese volunteers enrolled completed the study and underwent PK analysis. The maximum concentration (Cmax; ng/mL), area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUCt; h·ng/mL), and AUC from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC∞; h·ng/mL) of fasting administration were 22.35±7.02, 725.74±303.04, and 774.07±343.89, respectively, while the Cmax, AUCt, and AUC∞ administered after a high-fat meal were 28.95±12.60, 964.84±333.99, and 1031.28±392.80, respectively. The geometric mean ratios of Cmax, AUCt, and AUC∞ for high-fat meal/fasting administration of globalagliatin were 124.81%, 135.24%, and 135.42%, respectively, with 90% confidence intervals of 109.97-141.65, 124.24-147.20, and 124.42-147.39, respectively. Compared with the fasting state, healthy volunteers who consumed a high-fat meal showed a 24.8% increase in Cmax, a 35.2% increase in AUCt, and a 35.4% increase in AUC∞. The geometric mean of Tmax was 4.69h under fasting conditions and 5.93h in a high-fat state, with a median of 4.98h. Among the 24 enrolled volunteers, 9 cases (37.5%) had 11 AEs, and 6 cases (25.0%) had 7 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) after medication, all of which were cured or improved without taking any treatment measures. There were no SAEs in this study, no volunteers withdrew from the study due to AEs or ADRs, and no hypoglycemic events occurred during the trial. A high-fat meal increased the Cmax, AUCt, and AUC∞ of globalagliatin compared with fasting conditions in healthy Chinese adult volunteers. Meanwhile, globalagliatin showed favorable safety and tolerability under fasting or high-fat meal conditions.

Cytochrome P450 activity in rheumatoid arthritis patients during continuous IL-6 receptor antagonist therapy

BackgroundInflammation suppresses cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme activity, and single-dose interleukin 6 receptor antagonists (anti-IL-6R) reverse this effect. Here, we assess the impact of continuous anti-IL-6R therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.MethodsIn a clinical pharmacokinetic trial, the Basel cocktail was administered before and after 3 and 12 weeks of anti-IL-6R therapy to assess CYP enzyme activity (registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database (identifier NCT04842981) on April 13th, 2021). In a retrospective study, the 4β-hydroxycholesterol/cholesterol ratio was measured as a biomarker for CYP3A4 activity before and after 3 and 6 months of anti-IL-6R therapy. The control group was patients initiating a tumor necrosis factor alfa (TNF-α) inhibitor.ResultsIn the clinical pharmacokinetic trial (n = 3), midazolam metabolic ratio (CYP3A4) was inconclusive due to the limited sample size. Midazolam AUC and Cmax indicate a weak impact on CYP3A4 activity after 3 weeks of anti-IL-6R therapy compared to baseline (AUC geometric mean ratio (GMR): 0.80, 95% CI: 0.64–0.99 and Cmax GMR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.37–0.91), which returns to baseline levels after 12 weeks of therapy (AUC GMR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.72–1.46 and Cmax GMR 1.03, 95% CI 0.72–1.47). No effect on the 4β-hydroxycholesterol/cholesterol ratio was observed in the retrospective study.ConclusionBased on sparse data from three patients, continuous anti-IL-6R therapy seems to cause an acute but transient increase in CYP3A4 activity in rheumatoid arthritis patients, which may be due to a normalization of the inflammation-suppressed CYP activity. Further studies are warranted to understand the mechanism behind this putative transient effect.Trial registration Registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database (identifier NCT04842981) on April 13th, 2021.

Formulation development, in vivo bioequivalence and pediatric PBPK modeling studies of taste-masked ciprofloxacin chewable tablets

A taste-masked chewable tablet of ciprofloxacin using ion exchange resin Kyron T-134 for enhancing compliance for the paediatric population was developed. The drug-to-resin ratio was optimized for maximum taste masking by studying the effects of soaking time (X1) and mixing time (X2) on complexation (%) using Central Composite Rotatable Design (CCRD). The resin complexes were characterized by bitterness score, DSC, FTIR, and PXRD. The complex was further formulated and optimized into chewable tablets through full factorial design, The optimized formulation was subjected to a bioequivalence study, and a virtual approach of PBPK modelling was adapted to predict the pharmacokinetics of the drug in the paediatric group. The drug resin ratio of 1:1.5 yielded an optimum drug loading of 99.05%. The optimized formulation shows minimum disintegration time with more than 99% drug release within 30 min. The formulation F-9 was found to be bioequivalent with a geometric mean ratio of Cmax, Tmax, AUC0–t, and AUC0–∞ within 90% CI. It was concluded that quality by design approach can successfully be applied to optimize the drug resin ratio and PBPK modeling is a successful predictive tool for estimating the pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin HCl in the paediatric population.

Pharmacokinetics of Moxidectin combined with Albendazole or Albendazole plus Diethylcarbamazine for Bancroftian Filariasis.

Moxidectin (MOX) is a milbemycin endectocide recently approved by the U.S. FDA for the treatment of onchocerciasis in persons at least 12 years of age. MOX has been shown to have a good safety profile in recent clinical trials. The efficacy of MOX for the treatment of lymphatic filariasis (LF) and its potential use in mass drug administration protocols for the elimination of LF is currently under evaluation. In the context of a clinical trial, we investigated the pharmacokinetics and drug interactions of a combination of MOX plus albendazole (ALB) with or without diethylcarbamazine (DEC) compared to ivermectin (IVM) plus ALB with or without DEC in the following four different treatment arms: (I) IVM (0.2mg/kg) plus DEC (6 mg/kg) and ALB (400mg); (II) IVM plus ALB; (III) MOX (8 mg) plus DEC and ALB; and (IV) MOX plus ALB. Drug concentrations were determined using validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometric methods. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using standard non-compartmental analysis methods. Statistical analysis was performed using JMP software. Fifty-eight of 164 study participants (53 men and five women) were included with ages ranging from 18 to 63 yrs (mean = 37). MOX apparent oral clearance (Cl/F) ranged from 0.7 to 10.8 L/hr with Cmax values ranging from 20.8 to 314.5 ng/mL. The mean (range) area under the curve (AUC)0-∞ for MOX, 3405 ng*hr/mL (742-11376), and IVM 1906 ng*hr/mL (692-5900), varied over a ~15.3 and ~8.5-fold range, respectively. The geometric mean ratio for Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were within the no-drug interaction range of 80-125% for all drugs. This indicates that the addition of MOX to ALB alone or ALB plus DEC for LF therapy did not alter the drug exposure of co-administered drugs compared to IVM combinations. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04410406, https://clinicaltrials.gov/.

Two-Way Crossover Phase 1 Bioequivalence and Safety Studies in Healthy Adults for a Ready-to-Use, Room-Temperature, Liquid-Stable Glucagon Administered by Autoinjector, Prefilled Syringe, or Vial and Syringe.

To demonstrate bioequivalence and safety for a ready-to-use room-temperature liquid-stable glucagon administered subcutaneously (SC) through a glucagon autoinjector (GAI) or a glucagon vial and syringe kit (GVS), versus a glucagon prefilled syringe (G-PFS). Healthy adults (N = 32) were randomly assigned to receive 1-mg glucagon as GAI or G-PFS, and then as the alternative three to seven days later. Other healthy adults (N = 40) were randomly assigned to receive 1-mg glucagon as GVS or G-PFS, and then as the alternative two days later. Samples for plasma glucagon were obtained through 240 minutes after glucagon injection. Bioequivalence was declared when the geometric mean estimate ratio of the area under-the-concentration-versus-time curve from 0 to 240 minutes (AUC0-240) and maximum concentration (Cmax) for plasma glucagon between treatment groups was contained within the bounds of 80% and 125%. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for AUC0-240 and Cmax geometric mean ratios for G-PFS to GAI and GVS to G-PFS were contained within the bounds 80% to 125% (G-PFS:GAI AUC0-240 95.05%, 119.67% and Cmax 88.01%, 120.24%; GVS:G-PFS AUC0-240 87.39%, 100.66% and Cmax 89.08%, 106.08%). At least one AE occurred in 15.6% (5/32) participants with GAI, 25% (18/72) with G-PFS, and 32.5% (13/40) with GVS. Sixty-nine of 73 (94.5%) AEs were mild, and none were serious. Nausea was the most common (33/73 [45%]). Bioequivalence and safety were established after 1 mg of this ready-to-use room-temperature liquid-stable glucagon, administered SC to healthy adults, by autoinjector, prefilled syringe, or vial and syringe kit.

Pharmacokinetics of Nifedipine-Sustained Release Tablets in Healthy Subjects After a Single Oral Administration: Bioequivalence Analysis and Food Effects.

We compared newly developed delayed-release oral tablets (test) of 30-mg nifedipine (NFP) with its marketed counterpart (30mg; reference) in healthy adult Chinese volunteers to assess the former's bioequivalence. This was a randomized, open-label, four-period, crossover trial study including fasting and fed trials. The participantswere randomly administered test or reference formulations (1:1 ratio) throughout each period, with a 7-day washout period. In the next session, they were administered the alternate products. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and WinNonlin software were used to evaluate the bioequivalence of the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) of NFP and the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). In total, 46 and 48 people participated in the fasting and postprandial trials. In both groups, the 90% confidence intervals of geometric mean ratios of Cmax , AUC from time zero to time t, and AUC from time zero to infinity were in the equivalence range (80%-125%). When NFP was administered concomitantly with a high-fat meal, time to maximum concentration was approximately twofold earlier, absorption was approximately 4.8% less, and Cmax exhibited a slight change relative to those under fasting conditions. Moreover, no serious adverse events were recorded in the participants. The present findings confirm the bioequivalence of test and reference formulations of NFP tablets under fasting and postprandial conditions.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Cotadutide, a GLP-1 and Glucagon Receptor Dual Agonist, in Individuals with Renal Impairment: A Single-Dose, Phase I, Bridging Study.

Cotadutide is a balanced glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucagon receptor dual agonist under development for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and type 2 diabetes with chronic kidney disease. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety and immunogenicity of a single dose of cotadutide in individuals with varying degrees of renal impairment. In this phase I bridging study, individuals 18-85 years of age, with a body mass index of 17-40 kg/m2 and varying degrees of renal function {end-stage renal disease (ESRD; creatinine clearance [CrCl] < 20mL/min); severe renal impairment (CrCl ≥ 20 to < 30 mL/min); lower moderate renal impairment (CrCl ≥ 30 to < 44 mL/min); upper moderate renal impairment (CrCl ≥ 45 to < 60 mL/min); normal renal function (CrCl ≥ 90 mL/min)} were treated with a single dose of subcutaneous cotadutide 100 µg under fasted conditions in the lower abdomen. The co-primary endpoints were area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 48h (AUC48) and the maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) for cotadutide. Safety and immunogenicity were secondary endpoints. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03235375). A total of 37 individuals were enrolled in the study (only three enrolled in the ESRD group, therefore this group was excluded from the primary PK analysis). AUC48 and Cmax values for cotadutide were similar across all renal function groups {severe renal impairment vs. normal renal function: AUC48 geometric mean ratio (GMR) 0.99 (90% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-1.29); lower moderate renal impairment versus normal renal function: AUC48 GMR 1.01 (90% CI 0.79-1.30); upper moderate renal impairment versus normal renal function: AUC48 GMR 1.09 (90% CI 0.82-1.43)}. A sensitivity analysis that combined the ESRD and severe renal impairment groups did not show notable changes in the AUC48 and Cmax GMRs. The incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) ranged from 42.9 to 72.7% across all groups and were mostly mild to moderate in severity. Only one patient had a grade III or worse TEAE during the study period. No positive antidrug antibody results were observed. These results suggest that the PK and tolerability of cotadutide are unaffected by renal function and that dose adjustments may not be required in individuals with renal impairment.

Pharmacokinetic comparison of sitagliptin and metformin HCl extended-release tablets versus JANUMET® XR in healthy volunteers under fasting and fed conditions.

Background and Objectives: Janumet® XR is the combination of sitagliptin and extended metformin hydrochloride produced by Merck Sharp & Dohme. It is specially designed for diabetes mellitus patients taking both drugs already. Janumet® XR exhibited clinically significant blood glucose lowering efficacy and long-term use safety. However, no generic form of Janumet® XR has been approved in western countries. The relatively high cost made the medication less prescribed. A more affordable form of this drug may benefit an immense diabetes mellitus population. The current study compared the bioequivalence (BE) of sitagliptin 100mg and metformin 1000mg produced by Nanjing Chia-Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Company to Janumet® XR in healthy Chinese subjects. Methods: Twenty-eight healthy Chinese subjects were enrolled in Study 1 and 2, respectively. Both studies were conducted with an open, randomized, two-period crossover design using the test (T) or the reference (R) drug. Study 1 is conducted under the fasting state, and Study 2 is under the fed state. Subjects received an oral dose of sitagliptin 100mg and metformin 1000mg, and plasma concentrations of sitagliptin and metformin were determined up to 72h post-dose. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, including maximum serum concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve up to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t) of both sitagliptin and metformin, were calculated and compared between the T and R treatments. Results: In the fasting study, the geometric mean ratios of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ for sitagliptin were 109.42%, 101.93%, and 101.95%, respectively; the corresponding ratios for metformin were 98.69%, 94.12%, and 93.42%, respectively. In the fed study, the geometric mean ratios of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ for sitagliptin were 98.41%, 100.30%, and 100.24%, respectively; the corresponding ratios for metformin were 97.79%, 99.28%, and 100.69%, respectively. The 90% CIs of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ in both studies were all within acceptance limits (80.00%-125.00%). Conclusion: The results demonstrated for the first time that sitagliptin 100mg and metformin 1000mg produced by Nanjing Chia-Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Company was bioequivalent to the branded Janumet® XR, and both drugs were well tolerated.